Monday, July 23, 2012


SUMMARY: ANALEMMAS or RISING-SINKING CRUSTAL COMBINATIONS are common, and it is possible to view them up close, whenever they occur in ISOLATED CHANNELS  or WATERWAYS. These features develop by SHEARING in two directions: CCW for the larger-older-slower moving AXIAL (wobble with pole position constant) ARCS, and CW for the smaller-lower in elevation-irregular PRECESSIONAL FEATURES (POLAR WOBBLE TILTED-with continuously changing TILT ANGLE and POLE POSITION). Analemmas are developed by the EARTH-MOON-SUN GRAVITATIONAL MOVEMENTS, both LATERAL and VERTICAL. A COMMONLY VIEWED FEATURE is the BASIN and  RANGE- COLORADO PLATEAU PROVINCE, but it is difficult to grasp (because of the size). The DECEPTION PASS- CAMPBELL LAKE-MT. ERIE AREA is an area easily hiked and accessed- with good hiways, bridges, and moderate ELEVATION CHANGES:

GRAVITATIONAL ANALEMMA Development: Campbell Lake Island, Fidalgo I., Skagit County, WA example:
 This small island, in the middle of Campbell Lake, is chosen to analyze the development of an ANALEMMA, where faulting is not prominent in the shear and ROTATION of the earth’s crust. The lake and island are part of CRUSTAL LAND WAVES and SINKING-RISING of landmass in reaction to GRAVITATIONAL LATERAL and VERTICAL FORCE. There do occur small shearing-lateral rotations at the island, but the REGIONAL LATERAL FAULTING found at Deception Pass is not the driving entity here- at least not for the small scale. The lake is the SINK created by the SQUEEZING UPWARD of Mt. Erie, shown by the ELLIPTICAL ARRANGEMENT of lakes surrounding that uplift of about 300 k.y. time interval. This TIME is NOT ROCK AGE (Mesozoic metasediments outcropping). A geologist would ask how I determined the time interval and the IMPETUS of UPWARD SQUEEZING. The time interval (not necessarily the AGE) was calculated from the diameter of the ellipse, and is subject to biases of measurement, but the WAVE-UPLIFT-SINKING ENTITY is well-documented with some 50 cases, by me, throughout the world (mainly in North America). I cross-check the calculation of: TIME INTERVAL= arc diameter/tidal QUADRANT movement rate, whenever possible, by calculating the movement between two different adjacent arc fulcrums (centers of rotation), and dividing this by the calculated TIME DIFFERENCE:
RATE CHECK = OLDER FULCRUM- YOUNGER ADJACENT FULCRUM LOCATIONS (distance traversed) on Google earth/older- younger TIME DIFFERENCE. The time difference is not necessarily the AGE of either ARC DEVELOPMENT. The following CLUES are noticed for Campbell Lake, which help to develop a MATHEMATICAL MODEL:
This MODEL was finalized with a FULL MOON over the NE Pacific Ocean, where the above PROPELLER-SHAPED analemma developed, within CLOUD PATTERNS, on an EARTH SATELLITE PHOTO. Unfortunately, I didn't photograph it, and I have been waiting in vain for the INCIPIENT ANALEMMA to reappear. It will eventually, but the requirements are:
1. The NW Pacific must exhibit HIGH PRESSURE (no clouds, except for the two opposing sets of ARCUATE FEATURES);
 2. It changes within the hour, so that the TV screen must be viewed near NOON or it will not be adequately presented; and
3. There must be at least 2 "JERKS" for thickness, for the photo to be analyzed.

The LARGE VIEW, which represents at least 1.8 m.y. (probably that during the ICE AGE of 2+ m.y.) has a diameter of 19 km; it surrounds smaller, younger features- which "home in" on Mt. Erie and the Campbell Lake HALF CIRCLE. This represents a period when the LAKE SEDIMENTS were shifted laterally and upwardly to form the mountain. The half circle indicate that there is a TILT TO THE FEATURE, and this creates a LATERAL WAVE or transfer of mass to the mountain. This all happened during the ICE AGE, but this should NOT be inferred to be the STRATIGRAPHIC AGE. The rule that I have found for the entire globe is: FOR EVERY SINK THERE IS A RISE, USUALLY ONE WITHIN THE OTHER. Further, these ROTATIONS are found in SADDLES- where there is a LATERAL FAULT. These will not be found by stratigraphic displacement vertically, since the movement is mostly lateral. They must be located by SLICKENSIDES, SHEARED ROCK, CONCRETE SLABS, RIVER TRACES and CIRCULAR VALLEYS (ARCS). The PHYSICAL REASONING BEHIND THIS DEVELOPMENT is the DOWNWARD PRESSURE of the 1 km of ICE (1500 psi)- which is offset by "SQUEEZING" upward of the SEDIMENTARY COLUMN, at some weakness. WEAKNESS OCCURS at a combination of INFLECTIONS (2 OR MORE GRAVITATIONAL LATERAL ARCS MOVING at DIFFERENT RATES- CREATING SHEARING).

1.    Mt Erie is squeezed upwardly by the SINKING of LAKES surrounding the mountain; the sinking commences with the movement outwardly of earth from the sun, with the ICE AGE ELLIPTICAL MOVEMENT, CREATING EARTH DIAMETER ENLARGEMENT- EXTENSION in the CRUST (ORBITING SLOWER). The Island and mountain development rise by an OPPOSITE EARTH SHRINKING with EARTH COMPRESSION-ACCELERATION of ROTATION RATE around the sun (ORBITING FASTER, since the end of ICE AGE);
2.    The small island started rising approximately 14,000 years ago, and this agrees with the theorized 15,625 years from the BINARY THEOREM. The calculations yield intervals of 14.4 k.y. or less- errors of 8% or more. The AXIAL round ROTATION commences first, followed by the 25.6 k.y. development  (both are on-going). This is confirmed with the terrace being vacated on the west side of the island (island is moving southeastward- closing the separation to the lake shore (is the lakeshore moving faster- expanding- than the island?) ;
This is all HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE, since there occur many ARCUATE FEATURES- SOME CROSSING, SOME CONCENTRIC. I first find the AGE of incipience and from that get the associated diameter, PLOT IT, TAKE THE ASSOCIATED ORTHOGONAL and plot it also. This allows the SEARCH to be NARROWED. The associated ARCS MUST OCCUR NEAR THIS PRE-ARRANGED FEATURE. ANALEMMAS-ELLIPSES-CORIOLIS ROTATING ARCS are common, so that there is never a lack of data.

3.    Although the AXIAL ROTATION STARTED FIRST, it rotates slower than the PRECESSIONAL, due to the greater mass. There is about 1/6th difference, the same as for the RATIO of the WASATCH “RIP”/BEACH DEVELOPMENT TIME INTEVAL. This is interesting, since I have observed this ratio= ½-1/3rd before, in elliptical rotations. The beach required about 14.4/6= 2400 years to develop- following the RIP of the Wasatch line opening from the north (where there are NO TERRACES or vacated spaces);

4.    The Precessional part (north part of island) is both lower in elevation and slopes greater to the north more than the AXIAL part. This has been found to be the case, in general, e.g. the Colorado Plateau, CP, vs. the Basin and Range B-R, where CP is more flat and level in stratigraphic bedding compared to B-R, and where the lower elevation 25 m.y. basin is both sinking and is younger than the 41 my. CP. Another interesting measurement is the vertical thickness of CP and B-R, where the ratio is 40 (40.96?)/ 25 (25.6?)= 1.6, POSSIBLY the phi ratio (1.618);

5.    The movement of the island SE-ward indicates that it is rotating CCW (rising), which is another check on the CORIOLIS-ANALEMMA mechanism. This is instigated by the EARTH-MOON-SUN GRAVITATIONAL LATERAL and VERTICAL MOVEMENTS; and,
The island is DOME-SHAPED, and should the GRAVITATIONAL WAVE EXHIBITION HAVE COMPLETED, there should be a POND or WATER-CONTAINING PAN atop the dome. There are fishing boats nearby, so that it is possible to at least get to the TERRACES:

Footnote 1:

LATERAL TRANSFER of crust- occurring by VERTICAL ROTATION. This movement is Orthogonal to HORIZONTAL rotation, where a CCW RISE incurs a CW vertical movement  (whenever the tilt is more than 45 degrees). Using the elevation of Mt. Erie- 1273 ft. = 388 m. is equivalent to 12 degrees of rotation, for a 1785 m horizontal/388m vertical =4.6= cotan angle. This is insufficient for VERTICAL CLASSIFICATION, so that the rotation is CCW (curving the lake sediments laterally and then upwards toward the Erie peak). Siltation into the lake and erosion of the peak are unknown, and the present elevation above sea level is used for the NET GRAVITATIONAL MOVEMENT UPWARD. THIS is OPPOSITE to NORMAL DOWNWARD FALL, and this demonstrates the GRAVITATIONAL FRAGMENTATION PRINCIPLE.  This action is the result of the transfer of DOWNWARD WEIGHT of ICE (5km thickness, or about 800 psi on crust below ice), SQUEEZING the SEDIMENTARY COLUMN to emerge at some SHEAR CONCENTRATION in the ice and underlying rock. The WEAKNESS OCCURS at an N-S SHEAR LINEAR. This N-S line is pertinent for most of the ICE AGE, but there was a WEST TURN at the 15,625 year AGE. This introduces uncertainty into the uplift, but the deviation exists only at the GLACIAL LAST STAGE (creating an opening at the south side of the lake- with the ORTHOGONAL SHIFT). See the following photo- which has a LINEAR of 1024 m/196 degrees SSW. This indicates that the drainage started at 100k.y., and that it has been rotated to the EAST 24 degrees. The sheerest cliffs are the youngest on the eastside, which confirms that the oldest to the west have been abandoned first. I thought that the ORIGINAL ORIENTATION was N-S, but the analysis does NOT AGREE! It changed from
 Below photo has the NORTH ARROW UPWARD, not as shown in the introduction. NOTICE the LINEAR DRAINAGE at lower  left and the positioning of the island in center (younger wave):

220 to 196 degrees. This is a rotation of 1/15th of a circle, or a CIRCULAR TRACE in 1.5 m.y.- almost the ENTIRE ICE AGE! The GLACIAL EXHIBITION occurred due to an ELLIPTICAL ROTATION brought about by an ELONGATION of EARTH’S PATH by ORBITAL SLOWING-EXCESSIVE PATH LENGTH of earth orbiting the sun. This would indicate that ELLIPTICITY DIAMETER RATIO = 2/1.5= 1.33, which is EXCESSIVELY LARGE! I have been finding similar ratios for the COLORADO PLATEAU, CP, EDGE, and it appears that a GRAVITATIONAL ANOMALY OCCURRED. This seems unlikely, but a CLOSE APPROACH could have happened- where a rare encounter caused DEVIATION of the normal orbit about the sun. This would be the ELTANIN EVENT postulated by geologists. My finding is that the Qsna ellipse has a diameter ratio of near this magnitude of 1.33, and this must be PURSUED FURTHER!

6.    THESE GRAVITATIONAL WAVES exhibit several cycles, according to the 12+ month/year LUNAR ATTRACTION-REPULSION CYCLE. The 300k.y.  Mt Erie uplift = twelve 2500 k.y. impulses (12+ 2300 k.y. JERKS)! Campbell Lake results from the regular SINKING of the earth’s crust yearly, with the slowing of earth’s ORBIT by the FULL MOON EXTENSION of the DIAMETER. This is related to the regular dance of the earth-moon GYRATION of the two orbs around the CENTER OF MASS (BARYCENTER) yearly. Most of the time, the EARTH is slowing systematically with the SOLAR TIDES-FRICTION, but the moon offsets or AUGMENTS this on a monthly or bi-monthly basis!


The ice age is a result of an ELLIPTICAL ELONGATION of the EARTH ORBIT, caused by an unknown PERTURBATION from some GRAVITATIONAL INFLUENCE. It has elongated the near-circular orbit to a calculated ELLIPSE RADIUS of an extra third of normal (as shown by coastal and river paths). These ellipses occur on GOOGLE EARTH with 12-13 uplifts exhibited. This seems to correlate with the 12-13 FULL MOON OCCURRENCES YEARLY. If true, the temperature reduction is due to the earth becoming farther from the sun, while slowing, expanding with opening of grabens, creating bulges, and enlarging by ice thickness of 1 km in some locations.

Note that the SAN JUAN ISLANDS have rotated .2 degrees/k.y. before the perturbations ceased near the 15,625 year AGE, after which the ANOMALY made a turn to the west (shown by PENN COVE, WA on Whidbey Island) to 250 degrees from a N-S path prior. This calculates 3.6 degrees (a HARMONIC of the 40.96 m.y.-3.6 degree change at the 1/100th occurrence of the initial 4,096 m.y. LUNAR GRAVITATIONAL STARTUP).

These movements have been investigated in the field by stratigraphers, who find that WESTWARD THRUSTS have occurred with the Mesozoic and older rocks- placing several movements of older over younger in an uneven sequence (thrusts are not sequential in space and time). There are at least 5 of these, and my analysis of the LUNAR INFLUENCE predicts that there should be 6 (half of the yearly cycle exhibition). My analysis also shows that the thrusts occurred during the ICE AGE (from ARC-DIAMETER calculations). The rocks have been rotated CCW from the east with a 2 m.y. (or more) cycle.
Now look at the "BIG PICTURE" of the elliptical presentation of all of the San Juans:
The San Juan Islands 12+ island ELLIPSE is shown above, with the Orcas Island exhibit below:

Mt. Constitution, Orcas Island, WA- RISE DURING ICE AGE:

Orcas Island was covered with at least 1 km of ice during the last 2 m.y. (part of the time). This blanket of frozen water weighed at least .433 psi/ft, and for the squeezing upward of the 2407 ft elevation or 734 meters Constitution peak, yielded 1500 psi compression at times (when the coverage was complete). Pressure was relieved by extrusion (non-thermally), and the peak slowly rose over a calculated 361 k.y. time interval. When this rise is vertical, the NET CHANGE above sea level is 734m/361 k.y.= 2 mm/yr. This compares with that calculated for nearby Mt. Erie: 388m/360k.y.= 1mm/yr. The smallest lateral rate calculated for Mt. Constitution is 1 mm/yr, and I have found rates for Penn Cove and Holmes Harbor mounds= 1 mm/yr. Until I get more statistical information, I will use this magnitude. The rise of continents is no more than 1 mm/yr- which is the lateral expansion for N. Africa, Australia, and North America. I anticipate that vertical rate is half of lateral rate for TIDAL MOVEMENT RATE, but the local lateral rate is normally 10.24 mm/yr (10 times the continental expansion rate). The long term magnitude for SOLAR FRICTION (slowing) is near 10 km/m.y, but this is reduced whenever there is vertical movement- since gravitational energy is diverted to UPLIFT, as opposed to lateral shift. Mt Erie has a lesser elevation- 1273 ft, compared to Mt. Constitution at 2407 ft, and how can we explain this 2:1 difference during the SAME ICE AGE? The factors include:

a. The SCARPS face south for Erie, as opposed to East for Constitution;

b. The ORTHOGONAL SHIFT requires a 4:1 time interval contrast- which has been found from the analysis of GRAVITATIONAL SHIFTS in cardinal directions;

c. Lake spread occurs over a 4 km distance for both mountains;

d. Orcas Island is near 13.5/12 km= 1.1 x the size of Fidalgo Island, hence has been expanded over a slightly larger time interval;

d. Orcas has been split by 2 SOUNDS, hence has expanded laterally by this CANYON DEVELOPMENT (I used the N-S measurement for comparison); and,

e. Both are essentially on the same latitude line, so are subject to similar ICE THICKNESSES.

I conclude that both mountains are of the same age (same lateral spread), and that the 2:1 uplift occurs with Mt Constitution DOMINATED by LUNAR ATTRACTION, compared to Mt. Erie by SOLAR ATTRACTION. The question remains: How does the moon overcome the influence of the sun for these adjacent islands? The answer is FOUND for the different quadrants of LOCAL CRUST- the San Juans are in the NW quadrant, compared to Mt. Erie in the NE quadrant of the same BLOCK of CRUST! The TIDAL RATE is 2x for the NW, as compared to the NE. Thrusting is more pronounced for the San Juan Islands, compared to that in Fidalgo-Mt. Erie uplift!

East Sound, ORCAS Island originated with a N-S LINEAR, and has rotated CCW to form the present configuration. It has also caused the sound to enlarge E-W, as the small EARTH TIDES of 1 mm/yr have expanded it. This small movement, found from the FULCRUMS of two separate rotations, confirms the LUNAR-SOLAR LINEAR of almost NO SLOWING OF THE EARTH'S ORBIT. How is this possible? It occcurs with the small movement toward the sun, from the normal orbit, which offsets the normal LUNAR TIDAL FRICTION. The earth is not slowing, but accelerating as it moves closer to the sun!


 Strawberry Island is presented to illustrate UNCONFIRMED ANALEMMA RORATIONS-AGE. Not only is the TIDAL RATE at variance with the expected, but the AGE CALCULATION yields a time interval which indicates an incomplete 40 k.y. MILANKOVITCH CYCLE. This in spite of the occurrence of a younger SHEAR FEATIURE to the west! I have placed a PRECESSIONAL 1/1.6 RATIO CYCLE at the expected location, hoping to isolate the SHEAR ARCS. This was frustrated by NON-CONFIRMATION! Finally, where 20-30 mm/yr. TIDAL RATE, in the SW quadrant is expected- the calculation resulted in less than 10! This example will be deferred, until the influence of the Devil Mt fault SPLAY is isolated:
When you cross Deception Pass bridge, the island to the SE is Strawberry; it is in the channel, so that the SHEAR ROTATIONS ARCS may be viewed easily on Google Earth:

THIS ISLAND, although ELLIPTICALLY-SHAPED, and exhibiting an inflection on the north side, has VERY LITTLE on the SOUTH SIDE. This is opposite to that for Campbell Lake Island, even though the TIME INTERVALS (APPROXIMATELY 15 K.Y.) are similar. We have to ask the QUESTION: what determines the direction of "RIP' of the WASATCH LINE (linear separating the two oppositely-rotating AXIAL (CCW) and PRECESSIONAL (CW) FEATURES? I suspect that it is determined by a REGIONAL SINKING (CW), v.s. a REGIONAL RISING (CCW). This would indicate that the fidalgo peninsula is being "SQUEEZED" by compression, as opposed to an extensional OPENING of the Deception Pass Channel. Complicating this determination is the finding that the Pass had been opening during the ICE AGE, BUT THAT IT IS NOW CLOSING!

THE CLIFFS are so sheer, and the terrain so abrupt, that the most OBVIOUS FEATURE is that erosion cannot "keep up" with the north side moving southward:
The "BIG PICTURE" of the Fidalgo-Mt. Erie UPLIFT is shown, to indicate that it is a young entity; it has RISEN DURING the ICE AGE, due to compressional GRAVITATIONAL VERTICAL CCW RISE. The crust moves from the postiion now occupied by lakes, by the WAVE EFFECT- from convergence of RAYLEIGH-LIKE WAVES. We will try to find how it selects this location (likely determined by the COMBINATION of VERTICAL and HORIZONTAL MOVEMENTS, from LATERAL FAULTING).

No comments: