Saturday, December 3, 2011

Hudson Bay completes the CW circuit of North American MOUND ROTATION, where the 4096 km RISE has rotated and shifted WEST, since the Cretaceous

SUMMARY:
GRAVITATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS of the EARTH, MOON and SUN continually create RISING MOUNDS on the earth: continents, Colorado Plateau, and Checkerboard Mesa- generally the smallest within the larger. Mounds enlarge with time, creating mountains, west half of USA (from the Mississippi River), and finally expanding continents. The rate of growth is 20.48mm/yr, westerly and 10.24 easterly. The average rate is determined by the solar TIDE- WHICH IS 10.24 km per million years.


ALTHOUGH Qsna- THE NORTH AMERICAN QUADRANSPHERE- IS 10,485 KM IN DIAMETER (THE QUARTER OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE X 1.024 SQUARED), IT HAS A MEASUREMENT FROM THE EASTERN CONTINENTAL SLOPE TO THE MENDOCINO, CA "JUT" OF 4000 X 1.024= 4096 KM. THIS DEMONSTRATES TO ME THAT THE CONTINENT HAS BEEN "GROWING LATERALLY" (ENLARGING, AS WELL AS INCREASING IN ELEVATION ABOVE SEA LEVEL) SINCE THE APPEARANCE OF THE MOON 4.096 BILLION YEARS AGO:
ABOVE PHOTO SHOWS Qsna- THE NORTH AMERICAN BULGE, WHICH IS A MOUND IN ITSELF, BUT ONE WHICH HAS BEEN ACCENTUATED BY FOUR MAIN EVENTS- THE 4, 16, 64, 256 M.Y. EVENTS (ORIENTED AT THE FOUR CORNERS OF AN ELLIPTICAL ROTATION ABOUT THE MISSISSIPPI-OHIO RIVER JUNCTION; THINK NEW MADRID QUAKE OF Dec. 1811):
THE HUDSON BAY EVENT TRIGGERED MANY ROTATIONS, FROM PRECAMBRIAN TIME; IT IS THE INITIATOR OF A SERIES OF FRAGMENTATIONS OF ISLANDS TO THE NORTH:




COMPARE THE NORTH AMERICAN QUADRANSPHERE WITH THE SOUTH AMERICAN CIRCULAR PORTION (A MOUND ABOVE THE 20S PARALLEL). THIS IS A SIMPLER MOUND, WITH A DIAMETER SOMEWHAT LARGER THAN 4096KM- THE TIME OF FORMATION (TIDALLY) OF, OR ATTRACTION TO THE MOON:
AT A DISTANCE OF 10,485 KM (10K km- A QUARTER OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH, Qsna- X 10.24 SQUARED) FROM THE INFLECTION IN THE MAR, THERE IS A CLUE TO THE ACTION AT THE HAWAIIAN-EMPEROR SEAMOUNT CHAIN. THERE IS AN ABRUPT JERK AT THIS LOCATION TO THE SE OF HAWAII, INDICATING THAT AN EVENT IS BEING RECORDED.

THE THIRD CONTINENT IN THE SEQUENCE IS AFRICA, WHICH IS NOT AT THE CENTER OF THE 6 CONTINENT ARRAY; EUROPE IS LIKELY THE CENTER- LYING AT THE CENTER OF AN ELLIPTICAL ARRANGEMENT OF THE OTHER 6 CONTINENTS. HOWEVER THIS CANNOT BE SHOWN ON GOOGLE EARTH, WHERE THREE DIMENSIONS MUST BE PORTRAYED FOR ILLUSTRATION:

THE AFRICAN CONTINENT HAS EXPANDED ALSO, SINCE THE 4.096 BILLION YEAR AGE OF CREATION OF THE MOON. THE CONTINENTS HAVE BEEN GRAVITATIONALLY PULLED TOWARD THE MOON- SOME PERIOD OF EACH DAY (THE 6 SEPARATE ONES FROM THE CENTER MOUND INDICATING THAT THE DAY (24 HOURS) IS DIVIDED INTO 6-4 HOUR PERIODS, DURING WHICH THE G FORCE PULLS ON EACH CONTINENT. AFTER GETTING ITS "SHARE" OF BULGING for AN EASTERLY CONTINENT, THE ROTATION OF THE EARTH MOVES ON TO THE NEXT AVERAGE POSITION OF ANOTHER CONTINENT. NOTICE THAT THE RECENTLY-DISCOVERED "KAMIL" FEATURE IS LOCATED ON THE EASTERN EDGE OF THE LARGEST MOUND IN THE SEQUENCE. THIS INDICATES THAT IT PROBABLY IS NOT DUE TO AN ASTEROID STRIKE, BUT IS LIKELY THE REVERSE OF A MOUND- A "BLOWOUT" CRATER, SIMILAR TO THE AZ "METEOR CRATER".
BELOW IS SHOWN THE ARRANGEMENT OF MOUNDS ABOUT LIBYA- IN WHICH 6 MOUNDS ROTATE ABOUT THE CENTER MOUND, SHOWN BELOW:

NOW, TO A FEATURE, WHICH WE CAN CHECK IN THE FIELD, NOT ONE ON WHICH SUPPOSITIONS ARE THE MAINSTAY: THE LAVERKIN AND ASH CREEKS ILLUSTRATE A FEATURE WHICH OCCURS ON MANY SCALES: 100 YR. 1000, 10k, 100k, m.y. AND MULTI-MILLION (100, BILLION, AND FINALLY, ON THE 4 BILLION YEAR CYCLES). PHOTOS ABOVE AND BELOW WILL SHOW THE PATTERN FOR THE LAVERKIN SINK, BUT IT COULD JUST AS WELL BE FOR THE CP-B&R DUO, OR THE NORTH AMERICAN DOME OR PARTIAL CONTINENT:

ABOVE IS THE MILLION YEAR CIRCUIT, TRAVERSING SEVERAL DOMES OR RISING MOUNDS. THIS ELLIPTICAL ARRANGEMENT IS ALMOST CIRCULAR, AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCERN WHETHER THERE IS ANY DIFFERENCE. ARCS CONVEX TO THE EAST DISPLAY 10.24 KM/M.Y. RATES, WHILE THOSE ORIENTING TO THE WEST MOVE ON A 20.48 MM/YR. RATE.
BELOW IS THE DIGITAL PHOTO TAKEN NEAR THE LAVERKIN HOGBACK:



SIMILARLY TO WEATHER CELLS- WHICH ENLARGE AS THEY MOVE EASTWARDLY AND FORM SMALLER CELLS INTERNALLY- EARTH CELLS OR CYCLES HAVE MANY ARCS OF BOTH AXIAL AND PRECESSIONAL PORTRAITS FORMED WITHIN THE LARGER ONES. THESE STEADILY ENLARGE WITH TIME, AND THE DIAMETER IS PROPORTIONATE TO THE TIME OF MOVEMENT. THERE WILL OCCUR SINKS WITHIN RISES, AND RISES WITHIN SINKS; THESE ARE DUE TO EARTH CRUSTAL WAVES, WHICH MOVE EASTWARD AND INCORPORATE SMALLER ARCS WHILE DOING SO:
below is the GOOGLE PHOTO OF A TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT, CONSIDERING THAT THE CRUST OF THE EARTH RE-FORMS THESE CYCLES AND CELLS REPEATEDLY- ON A 100 YR., 1K YEAR, 10 K.YEAR, 100 K.Y, 1 MILLION, 10 M.Y. 100 M.Y.- UNTIL THE ORIGINAL FORMATION OF THE MOON AT 4 BILLION YEARS X 10.24= 4.096 B.Y:
OTHER ELLIPSES ARE SHOWN FOR MOST OF THE REST OF THE GLOBE:

THERE ARE "WAVES" OF ARCS (LAND WAVES, NOT WATER WAVES) WHICH SUCCEED THE OLDER AND LARGER DIAMETER WAVES AND ARE SMALLER IN THE DIRECTION OF PROGRESSION OF TIME- BECAUSE THE DIAMETER IS PROPORTIONAL TO THE TIME INTERVAL OF DEVELOPMENT OF A PARTICULAR WAVE (THIS IS NOT THE SAME AS AGE, BUT REPRESENTS AN INCREMENT OF TIME.
THERE IS AN INFLECTION FOR THE EAST ASIA ARC, INDICATING THAT THERE WAS A REVERSAL OF MOVEMENT DURING THE PRECAMBRIAN:


DIFFICULT TO SEE, WHAT WITH ALL THE NECESSARY ANALYSES REQUIRED, BELOW IS THE SET OF 4 MOUNDS (CONTINENTS) SURROUNDING THE PACIFIC OCEAN. THIS BODY OF WATER IS SLOWLY BEING REDUCED IN SIZE, BECAUSE OF THE IMPINGEMENT OF LAND MOVING IN FROM ALL DIRECTIONS. THIS IS THE WORK OF GRAVITY- FROM THE MOON, BUT SECONDARILY THE SUN, AS IT "PULLS" THE CRUST UPWARD (SIMULTANEOUSLY SPREADING THE LAND MASSES):
NOW WE CAN SOLVE THE MYSTERY OF THE CONTINUAL PROGRESS OF THE HAWAIIAN-EMPEROR SEAMOUNT CHAIN SOUTHWARD, WHICH IS SHOWN AS MOVING REGULARLY UNTIL THE KIMMEI SEAMOUNT:
AFTER PASSING THE "CRITICAL TIME" OF THE EVENT OF 40-41 M.Y., THE PREVIOUS NORTH ORIENTATION OF THE HI-E CHAIN LURCHED TO THE SOUTHEAST. THIS IS INDICATIVE OF THE EVENT WHICH OCCURRED, FORMING THE EQUATORIAL BULGE, EB, AND WHICH RESULTED IN RENEWED SHOVE WESTWARD OF THE NW COAST. NORTHERN CA, OR, AND WA ALL OVER-RODE THE CONTINENTAL SHELF TO CREATE VULCANISM WITH THE SHOVE DOWNWARD OF THE YOUNG SEDIMENTS (WITH SIGNIFICANT EXCESS OF WATER):

HAWAIIAN EXTRUSIONS RESULT FROM THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TWO GREAT MOVEMENTS OF CCW TO THE EAST (WITH WEST TIDES AND CONVEX ARCS POINTING TO THE WEST) AND CW ROTATIONS TO THE WEST, WITH SMALLER 10.24MM/YR TIDES, WEST OF THE ISLANDS (SEE SEAMOUNTS VS GRID-LINES):
MAGNIFYING FURTHER, THE RELATIONSHIP OF GRID LINES, THEIR ORIENTATION, AND THEIR PORTRAIT OF TWO MASSIVE TIDES COMING FROM THE WEST AND NORTH CAN BE SEEN TO "OVERWHELM" THE LESSER 10.24MM/YR TIDES ARRIVING FROM THE EAST (BAJA, MEXICO), WITH CW ROTATION:

THE "LAND WAVES" LOOK AND PERFORM SIMILARLY TO WATER WAVES. THE BEST PHOTO I HAVE SO FAR, IN MY ARCHIVES, IS THAT OF NIAGARA FALLS- WHICH IS SIMILAR, AND IT SHOWS THE EARTH'S CRUST IN PERPENDICULAR ORIENTATIONS (FOR SEPARATED PORTIONS OF THE CLIFFS) AT LATERAL VIEWS. NOTICE THAT THERE IS TURMOIL AT THE FALLS, BUT THE WATERS ARE MORE PLACID BELOW (BOATS MAY USE THE LOWER CHANNEL). THE ENERGY OF CREATION OF FOAM AND CIRCULAR CURRENTS DEVELOPS HEAT INSTEAD FOR VULCANISM, FOR THE LARGER CASE OF HAWAIIAN ISLANDS:
ANOTHER OCCURS AT THE ZAMBEZI FALLS IN AFRICA:
FURTHER INFORMATION FOR ANALYSIS OF THE HAWAIIAN ENIGMA IS FOUND FROM VIEWING THE SPACING FROM OTHER KNOWN FEATURES OF THE PACIFIC, SUCH AS THE HOURGLASS AND OUTPOSTS SUCH AS WAKE AND JOHNSON ISLAND:


THE PACIFIC HAS AN ELLIPSE OF MOUNDS SURROUNDING IT, BUT THERE IS AN INFLECTION IN THE CURVE- THIS HINTS OF TWO SEPARATE ARCS:
SURE ENOUGH, THE RATIO OF THE RADII OF THE 2 FEATURES IS 1.6:1; THIS MEANS THAT ON THE LARGEST AND OLDEST SCALE FOUND SO FAR, BOTH THE AXIAL AND PRECESSIONAL CYCLES ARE PORTRAYED FOR THE EARTH'S CRUST:
ANTARCTICA SHOWS THE SAME RATIO OF AXIAL/PRECESSIONAL, OF 1.6, BUT THE MAGNITUDE OF THE FEATURES IS GREATER. THIS YIELDS HINTS OF THE REASON FOR AUSTRALIA AND THE TONGA TRENCH MOVING FASTER TO THE NORTH THAN ANY OTHER ENTITY FOUND ON EARTH: 28 CM/YEAR.

There are other harmonics displaying their “etchings” on the Earth’s CRUST and in its movements. An interesting one is that of the ANALEMMA- the figure 8 movement of the sun in a year of time. This is captured in the below photo, where I have measured the ratio of the spiral south of the equator to that of the spiral to the north:


The ratio is 2.15, as well as I can determine it from this photo. But it shows its “colors” in the literature, such as with the Eltanin EVENT- a supposed strike not yet found. This may be noticed in another harmonic of the 1.024 ratio of the sphericity of 102,400 (BINARY THEOREM)/100,000 years by MILANKOVITCH for the earth, in the series: 1.024, 2.048, 4.096, 8.192, 16.384, 32.768, 65.536, 131.072, 262.144, 524.288, 1048.576. 2097.152, 4194.304, 8388.608, 16777.216, 33554.216, 67108.864, 134217.728, 268435.456, 536870.912, 1.073741.82 years, and 2.1475 million years. This is close enough to the radioactivity-dated ELTANIN EVENT, to warrant further investigation. 1.024 is the 1/10th HARMONIC of the binary theorem, and it appears in the lateral fracture patterns in outcrops:



PLANETARY ORBITS AROUND the SUN, relative to EARTH
MERCURY VENUS EARTH MARS JUPITER SATURN
___________________________________________________
87,969 day 224.70 d. 365.256363 779.96 4332.89 d. 10,759.22
4.152 ratio 1.6255 M 1 AU .4683 .0843 .03395
___________________________________________________
MILANKOVITCH RATIOS: elliptical/axial = 100/41 k.y.= 2.439
AXIAL/PRECESSIONAL= 41/25.2225= 1.6255 DOMINANT
ELLIPTICAL/PRECESSIONAL= 100/25.2225= 3.965; inacc.

USING THE ADJUSTED RATIO 100/4.152= 24.08 byT&E,
This might be an earlier TROPIC OF CANCER angle.

Binary theorem 102.4/4.152 yields 24.66 yrs. for precession,
And it appears that there is a small influence of Jupiter.
The best re-arrangement of yearly arcs is to use the BINARY numbers: 102,400 years for the elliptical cycle, the VARIABLE angle of the EQUINOX for the PRECESSIONAL, and 40.96 k.y. for the AXIAL: 102.400/4.152= 24.663- the pertinent cycle. Checking: 40.96/24.663= 1.66, which yields a 2% divergence from the measured 1.6255 ratio of VENUS/EARTH ORBITS. This can be “laid off” on the influence of Jupiter, until there is field evidence otherwise.

FINALLY, THERE IS THE LARGEST SET OF 1.6:1 PACIFIC PLATEAU (ABYSSAL PLAIN) AND ADJACENT BASIN AND RISING ISLANDS (LINE ISLANDS AND ANOTHER PARALLEL TO THE LINEAR). THE GLOBE CAN ENCOMPASS ONLY OTHERS OF SIMILAR DIAMETER. NOTICE THAT THE WASATCH LINE- WHICH SEPARATES AUSTRALIA IN TWO PARTS (SIMILAR TO THE ORIGINAL LINE IN CENTRAL UTAH)- IS A UNIVERSAL FEATURE ALSO. IT DERIVES FROM THE SEPARATION OF ANY SCALE SIZE FLAT-LYING POLAR WOBBLE PRESENTATION, FROM THE NEXT DOOR TILTED SMALLER ROTATION. THESE DERIVE FROM THE INFLUENCE OF VENUS- OUR INNER SOLAR SYSTEM NEIGHBOR- AS IT GRAVITATIONALLY PULLS THE EARTH TOWARD THE SUN. THIS SHRINKS THE EARTH, CREATES A FASTER RATE OF MOVEMENT (TEMPORARILY) AROUND THE SUN, AND GENERALLY CREATES WEATHER OF FASTER-MOVING COLD MASSES COMING FROM THE VICINITY OF THE ALEUTIAN SPIRAL:


Above photo is pictorial only; it does not have careful detail- only the elliptical depiction is correct. The ELLIPSE should go through the EQUATORIAL transform at the bulge of Africa, along the transform to the Death Valley geothermal area, to northern Canada, to Hudson Bay, to the basin below the ice in Greenland, W-E through Iceland, crossing along Europe back to Africa. It is difficult to use accurate depiction for such a large portrait.
However, the photos below are more accurate, since they pertain to a smaller area- one with which I am familiar, and one which shows detail of rotations and shear features. Notice that the ELLIPSE of smaller ELLIPSES for the states of CA, NV, and UT shows the arrangement of mountains and rivers- so that the arcs and time intervals are more certain. Several large anomalies have been incorporated: Death Valley, Hot springs, arcuate arrangement of mountain chains, and the Colorado River “break-through”. In addition, the TIDAL NET WESTWARD MOVEMENT RATE is calculated from the net movement of the various ellipses (which are rotating CCW, with the smaller near the Colorado). The theoretical rate by the BINARY THEOREM should be 20.48 mm/yr for arcs convex to the west, and this calculation shows tha the net reate is 20.75mm/yr- yielding a 2.5% error. This error is likely due to my hand errors of measurement and selection, but there has been found to be at least 1% error in all ARCUATE ANALYSES, for calculation of TIME INTERVALS and location of Latitude and Longitude. Generally, diameter of all features increases with time, where the smallest has occurred last in progression of time. The photo indicates a CW enlargement, which is not the progression with TIME:



GRAVITATIONALLY-DETERMINED SOLAR MASS RATIOS:
_____________________________________________________
BODY SEPARATION REFERENCE RATIO OCCURRENCE ***
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EARTH 149.7exp. 6km SUN distance 1 AU yearly x pi 470.3 circ.
EARTH 384.4exp. 3km MOON center .389 AU x pi 1207.6exp. 3
*inverse 2.56 fits BINARY THEOREM: MAJOR EPISODE exp.8(years)_____________________________________________________
VENUS 108.2exp. 6km EARTH dist: .7228 AU, INVERSE: 1.384
VENUS 224.7 days orb, earth 365.2: 1.62 (AX/PREC.) rock ARCS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARS 227.9exp. 6km/ EARTH 149.7: .6569 (1.522): Analemma?
MARS 687 days; EARTH 365.2: 1.88 (.5316) : years/JERK, small
_____________________________________________________
MERCURY 57.9exp. 6/EARTH 149.7: .3868 (2.585): Ellipt./Axial
MERCURY 88 days orbit EARTH 365.2: .241 (4.15): ellipt./Prec.*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUPITER 778.4exp.6/EARTH 149.7: 5.197 (.1924): Rock Search*
JUPITER 11.9 years/Earth I year: 11.9 (.0840), geophysical year11
Other PLANETS REMOTE, unlikely to observe in ROCK SHEAR



Above order relates to the BINARY THEOREM- where events occur regularly with the EARTH’S CRUST. These are categorized by geologists as EXTINCTIONS caused by ASTEROID STRIKES, but I have found that the events are due to the influence of the MOON and other bodies in the SOLAR SYSTEM (such as Venus, Mercury, Mars, and distant planets- for the million year scales). ASTEROID STRIKES MAY ACCOMPANY THE EVENTS, since they strike with regularity, but the events are due to instabilities of the earth’s crust with periodic gravitational adjustments. We are referring to such entities as RISE of CONTINENTS, ELLIPTICAL arrangement of REGIONS, SHEAR of rock in axial, precessional, and elliptical Milankovitch patterns, and thrust faulting and folding. Notice that the drastic events occur in multipliers of 4, but that others in between- such as 512, 128, 32, 8, and 2 m.y. are associated with DISTINCTIONS, where fossils indicate an improvement in Life’s organic entities. I surmise that this is due to the introduction of PROTEIN, with actual asteroid strikes, so that there is a gradual “UPGRADE” of life (COMPLEXITY) afterwards. Examples include the Burgess Shale, with the sudden increase of multi-cell and chordates, and the changes noticed in the Oregon (32m.y.) fossils. I label this category “DISTINCTIONS” to note the contrast with EXTINCTIONS. Again, the order is with a x4 multiplier- fitting with the BINARY THEOREM.
The earth is separated from the sun by 149.7 million km, but only 384.4 K km from the moon. This ratio is 389.4, and may be approximated by 400:1. Closer to home, the ratio of the distance of the orbit of monthly EARTH-MOON gyration about the center of the combined DUO system (the BARYCENTER of mass) is 384.4K/4641km= 82.83. This RATIO of ratios is .2127, or inversely: 4.70 (approximately 5). This gyration or “little dance” about the center of mass occurs monthly, and appears to cause the water mass in rivers to slosh from one bank to the opposite during the month. This undoubtedly causes part of the creation of MEANDERS, as the water erodes opposing banks of the streams monthly. The BARYCENTER lies 1710 km below the earth’s surface, and this subtracted from the radius of 20,000/pi (6366 km) yields 4656 km (vs. 6378 km at EB). The discrepancy results from the ELLIPTICITY of the earth, which has a variation of less than 1/10th from polar radius to that at the equator (approximately 1/300th or .335%: 6378.1 km at equator, compared to 6356.8 at the pole- a difference of 21.3km). This centrifugal “SLING” results in the EQUATORIAL BULGE, EB, which exerts its influence noticeably at the Mendocino 40N transform, CA. North of this latitude, there is less MOON FRICTION on the earth’s surface, and the higher latitudes move relatively faster to the east (TIDAL FRICTION causes EB to move westward, relatively, and to DISCONNECT, or shear the rocks at this transform- roughly the 40N latitude across North America: Kansas southern boundary, the E-W Uinta Mountains, and Long Island).
The importance of all this is manifested in the RATIOS of measurements: the 80 (BARYCENTER, moon distance)and the 5 (sun, moon, barycenter) ratios are decidedly different from that created by Venus- 1.62 for noticeable ratios for shear in ROCKS (AXIAL/PRECESSIONAL WOBBLES). They do not coincide with other correlated ratios found on the earth, either: 4, for elliptical/precessional Milankovitch cycles, or 2.5 for elliptical/axial. These ratios are approximated by numbers easy to remember, whereas the measured values only depart from the BINARY THEOREM by1-5%: 102.4 and 2.56 for a ratio of 40, as contrasted to Milankovitch’s 100 to 41= 2.44.
I will try to find FEATURES on the EARTH (rock arcs of shear, river patterns, and curvilinear) which indicate that the monthly EARTH-MOON dance or the influence of the sun is other than we have found so far. The relative IMPORTANCE of gravitational events should be: MOON, (major tides: 20.48 mm/yr) SUN (10.24 average TIDES), VENUS (1.62 RATIO of axial/precessional WOBBLES), MARS (EARTHQUAKES of 1-10 years occurrence), and mercury (ellipses of 4.17 ratio) with some long-range influence from Jupiter. We will use these relative features as a guide to interpreting the shear and ellipses found in local outcrops- NEAR THE HURRICANE FAULT, Hf.
I will try to find FEATURES on the EARTH (rock arcs of shear, river patterns, and curvilinears) which indicate that the monthly EARTH-MOON dance or the influence of the sun is other than we have found so far. The relative IMPORTANCE of gravitational events should be: MOON, SUN, VENUS, MARS, and mercury, with some long-range influence from Jupiter. We will use these relative features as a guide to interpreting the shear and ellipses found in local outcrops- NEAR THE HURRICANE FAULT, Hf.
The importance of all this is manifested in the RATIOS of measurements: the 80 (BARYCENTER, moon distance)and the 5 (sun, moon, barycenter) ratios are decidedly different from that created by Venus- 1.62 for noticeable ratios for shear in ROCKS (AXIAL/PRECESSIONAL WOBBLES). They do not coincide with other correlated ratios found on the earth, either: 4, for elliptical/precessional Milankovitch cycles, or 2.5 for elliptical/axial. These ratios are approximated by numbers easy to remember, whereas the measured values only depart from the BINARY THEOREM by1-5%: 102.4 and 2.56 for a ratio of 40, as contrasted to Milankovitch’s 100 to 41= 2.44.

QUESTIONS REMAINING from FEATURES SEEN ON GOOGLE EARTH:
1. There are large ellipses surrounding CONTINENTS, REGIONS, and VOLCANIC EXTRUSIONS; WHAT gravitational entity determines these?
2. The harmonics of the BINARY THEOREM are noticed in rock shear and rotation, in multiples of 1/10th , 10, 100, and thousand. These relate to shear analyses of 2 to 100 million years; what is the impetus for these?
3. The half circle of a rotation is split down through the middle (possibly 5/8th), as the beginning of a smaller, younger arc; even bays are half-moon shaped, with a rise or sand bar roughly in the center. What determines the incipience of these interrupted, yet younger features? And,
4. The EARTH WAVES are variable in separation, although remaining parallel, until rotations make them arcuate. What gravitational entity causes the enlargement of BASINS, with time?

Friday, December 2, 2011

Mima MOUNDS show development of ELLIPTICAL ROTATIONS, with 10.24 mm/year on the east side and 20.24 TIDAL MOVEMENTS on the west



The classic enlarged MIMA MOUND, shown at Toquerville, UT allows a major DYNAMIC of the earth to be solved. Below and above is shown how this Pleistocene feature has developed within a million year ELLIPSE:
THIS JURASSIC NAVAJO SANDSTONE WAS FORMED BY THE WIND, AND HAS CROSS-BEDDING WHICH DOES NOT INDICATE ANYTHING FOR LAYERING ANALYSIS- EXCEPT THAT THE DIRECTION OF THE ANCIENT WIND CAN BE DERIVED FROM THE TRACE OF THE MOVED SAND (ESCAPING THE PALEO WIND AND BEING PRESERVED ON THE DOWNWIND SIDE- THE WINDS WERE FROM THE NORTH). THE RED LAYER-LIKE FEATURE IS NOT TRUE BEDDING, BUT RESULTS FROM THE SANDSTONE BEING MORE LEVEL- PREVIOUSLY- AND WHICH RECEIVED PERCOLATING WATER MOVING LATERALLY. THIS PROCESS INTRODUCED DISSOLVED IRON AND MANGANESE, AND THE RED COLORING DOES NOT EXIST BELOW OR ABOVE. AT THE TIME OF DISCOLORATION, THE RED PORTION WAS NEAR HORIZONTAL AND BELOW THE GROUND SURFACE. THIS IS INDICATED BY THE LACK OF STAIN BELOW AND ABOVE IN THE NORMAL SAND-COLORED DUNE SANDSTONE. LATER THE DOME MOVED UPWARDLY (OR EROSION UNCOVERED IT) AND THE IRON SS. WAS SHOVED UPWARDLY TO THE WEST. SIMULTANEOUSLY, PORTIONS WERE SEGMENTED AND ROTATED IN SMALLER "CHUNKS": TOQUERVILLE MOUND ABOVE HAS SEVERAL ARCUATE FEATURES WITHIN IT. IT HAS A CENTER-LINE VERTICAL FAULT (EXACTLY N-S), AND ARCUATE LATERAL FAULTING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER-LINE. THERE ARE 2 SMALLER DOMES ON THE NE AND SE SIDES, BUT NO OTHERS OF SIGNIFICANCE. IT IS MORE COMPLICATED THAN THE SMALLER DOMES FOUND NEAR THE AZ BORDER (ALSO HIGHER, WIDER, AND LARGER OVERALL).

The principle of this finding is due to the WOBBLE of the POLES- which create MILANKOVITCH CYCLES- that rotate in 25.6 (PRECESSIONAL) and 40.96 (AXIAL) k.y. time intervals. The above Google photos show clearly that convex arcs facing east have half of the tidal movement of those facing west. This is due to the influence of solar tides whenever MILANKOVITCH rotations face eastward, and are superseded by lunar tides, for the convex features facing west. That this is exactly a 2:1 presentation is shown by the BINARY THEOREM, where the harmonics have a series shown in rock shear: 100 years, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600 years. A smaller series has the numbers 10, 30, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280, 2560, 5120, 10240, 20480, 40960 years. The TIDAL MOVEMENT NUMBERS derive from a fourth and a half of the 4.096 root number: 10.24 and 20.48 mm/year (km/m.y.).
THIS HAS INTRODUCED a new facet- that there must be a series with multiples of 1000: 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000, 64000, 128000, 256000, 512000 yr, 1.024 million years. I had noticed that there were these multiples, but had ignored them (waiting for the TIME when I had FIELD EVIDENCE, with digital photos. Now it is necessary to determine whether there is a million year cycle of the earth, or whether the feature is more likely 1.024m.years in development. My intuition is that the slightly larger number is appropriate, and that Milankovitch could not calculate this small difference (2.4%).

BELOW IS A VIEW OF MOUNDS- COURTESY OF WIKIPEDIA- USED BY THE MOUND-DWELLER CULTURES OF THE EASTERN USA FOR RESPITE FROM FLOODS. THIS SHOWS THAT THE MOUNDS WERE FORMED BY ROTARY SHEAR WITH MALINKOVITCH-TYPE CYCLES. THE LOCATIONS CAN BE RELIED UPON TO DEFINE EARTH CRUST'S REGIONS OF FOLDING, THRUSTING, AND QUAKE-PRONE ZONES:


Another set of MOUNDS, which has a basin surrounding its IGNEOUS QUARTZ MONZONITE INTRUSION formation outcrop is that at the TOQUERVILLE FEEDER FROM hiway 17, near I-15 Anderson junction (NORTH SIDE). Above photo is taken of blocks of quartz monzonite- an intrusive rock found in the Pine Valley Mountains. Geologists continually argue as to the origin of these detached blocks. Are they fallen from an intrusive overhang, do they derive from gravity sliding, or do they indicate separate intrusions? This photo shows that they simply have sheared and rotated away from the parent mass, with the rotation of the 1 m.y. ellipse. Now, the question is: will they go into DENIAL, or will they continue to ARGUE?
The main question for me is: Will the million year rotation express itself as a 200 year major EARTHQUAKE? This is the anniversary of the largest main 48 states quake of all time- December 1811, the New Madrid super quake, that the geologists don’t understand. I have a significant shake predicted for the USA, and Laverkin, UT is the “USUAL SUSPECT”. It has already sunken in my 7 years of observation, and one house has been condemned near the Laverkin Creek bluff.
Now we have to concern ourselves with the divergence of the original BINARY THEOREM, where the sequence is: 2, 4, 8, 16 (Columbia basalt flood), 32, 64 (KT), 128, and 256m.y. (PTr). It now seems apparent that there is another HARMONIC series: 1K YEARS, 2K, 4K, 8K, 16K, 32K, 64K, 128K, 256K, 512K, 1.024 MILLION, 2.048, 4.096, 8.192, 16.384, 32.768, 65.536 million years (NEW KT, agreeing more with the radioactivity dating), and so on. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE MANY HARMONICS, AND WE HAVE TO DETERMINE WHICH IS MOST APPROPRIATE FROM FIELD DATA AND ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL PHOTOS.

FINDINGS SHOWN ABOVE ALLOW SOLUTION TO A MYSTERY I NOTICED AT THE EDGE OF THE PINE VALLEY MONZONITE BLOCKS (WHICH HAVE BEEN ROTATED AWAY FROM THE PARENT LACCOLITH). I HAD NOTICED THAT THERE WAS A CURVILINEAR TREND TO THE "ETCHINGS" into the QUARTZ-LIKE ROCK; THIS NOW IS APPARENTLY RELATED TO THE REGULAR "JERKS" OF THE MILLION YEAR SHEAR CIRCLE. THIS HAS VALUABLE INFORMATION, IN THAT THE CYCLICAL NATURE OF THE JERK TIMING MAY NOW BE SEEN. WE WILL MEASURE THE SEPARATION OF THE INDENTATIONS, TO DETERMINE THE REGULARITY AND SPACING (IN TERMS OF TIMING AND RELATION TO MAJOR QUAKES). THE LATERAL SEPARATION OF THE CURVILINEARS CAN BE USED TO OBTAIN THE DIAMETER OF THE SHEAR CIRCLE; POSSIBLY IT IS NOT 1 M.Y. SEPARATION APPEARS FROM THE PHOTO TO BE 10 CM OR MORE, AND 10 CM YIELDS 10 YEAR SEPARATIONS. THIS WOULD MAKE THE LARGER SHEAR CIRCLE A MILANKOVITCH 100 K.Y. FEATURE, AND THE RESULTANT "JERK" A FASTER FEATURE:

SOLVING THE TIME SPACING FROM THE INDENTATIONS REQUIRES THAT I MEASURE THE SEPARATION IN DISTANCE AND THE CIRCLE OF SHEAR TO WHICH THEY PERTAIN. SHOULD THEY BE PART OF A MILLION YEAR FEATURE (1 KM DIAMETER, PI CIRCUMFERENCE, OR 3140 M, 314,000 CM), THEN THE SPACING WILL BE A PART OF A 10.24 X DIAMETER, IN METERS ARC. IF THE CIRCUMFERENCE IS PI KILOMETERS, THE TIME WOULD BE 3.1416 X 1000 METERS, 314,000 CM, OR 31,400 YEARS PER JERK (I HAVE USED 10, RATHER THAN THE MORE CORRECT 10.24 MM/YEAR AVERAGE TIDAL WESTWARD MOVEMENT). I WILL HAVE TO RETURN TO THE FIRST MONZONITE OUTCROP NW OF I-15, TO SEARCH FOR THIS SET OF CURVILINEARS. YOU CAN SEE THAT THE LATERAL SEPARATION IS NOT CONSTANT BUT SOMEWHAT STATISTICAL. WE WILL USE THESE MEASUREMENTS TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE TIME OF ROTATION, AND TO GET THE REGULARITY OF THE EXPANSION OF THE SHEAR CIRCLE WITH TIME. THIS IS VALUABLE, SINCE THE CIRCULAR EXPANSION ALSO JERKS WITH TIME, AND IS NOT CONTINUOUS. I SUSPECT THAT THE FEATURE PERTAINS TO THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE EARTH'S CRUST TO THE ELLIPTICAL CYCLE OF THE EARTH IN THE EARTH-MOON-PLANETS-SUN GRAVITATIONAL CYCLES.

THERE ARE VARIOUS SIZES OF THE MONZONITE MOUNDS, AND I MUST HIKE INTO THE FIELD TO DISCERN THE RIGHT ONE. THE AGES VARY, AND I HOPE THAT I CAN FIND THE ONE WHICH HAS THE TIC MARKS IMPRINTED

FROM MY MEMORY OF 3 YEARS PRIOR, THE CORRECT OUTCROP APPEARS TO BE THE ONE ABOVE, AND THE AGE OF THE ELLIPSE WOULD BE DETERMINED BY A 25.6 K.Y. PRECESSIONAL CYCLE (HAVING A CIRCUMFERENCE OF 25K YR. X 1 CM/YR= 250 METERS). USING 10 CM AS A GUESS FOR THE SPACING OF THE TICS, YIELDS A YEARLY "TIC MARK"! THIS SEEMS UNREASONABLE, AND I MUST MEASURE IN THE FIELD.