The classic enlarged MIMA MOUND, shown at Toquerville, UT allows a major DYNAMIC of the earth to be solved. Below and above is shown how this Pleistocene feature has developed within a million year ELLIPSE:
THIS JURASSIC NAVAJO SANDSTONE WAS FORMED BY THE WIND, AND HAS CROSS-BEDDING WHICH DOES NOT INDICATE ANYTHING FOR LAYERING ANALYSIS- EXCEPT THAT THE DIRECTION OF THE ANCIENT WIND CAN BE DERIVED FROM THE TRACE OF THE MOVED SAND (ESCAPING THE PALEO WIND AND BEING PRESERVED ON THE DOWNWIND SIDE- THE WINDS WERE FROM THE NORTH). THE RED LAYER-LIKE FEATURE IS NOT TRUE BEDDING, BUT RESULTS FROM THE SANDSTONE BEING MORE LEVEL- PREVIOUSLY- AND WHICH RECEIVED PERCOLATING WATER MOVING LATERALLY. THIS PROCESS INTRODUCED DISSOLVED IRON AND MANGANESE, AND THE RED COLORING DOES NOT EXIST BELOW OR ABOVE. AT THE TIME OF DISCOLORATION, THE RED PORTION WAS NEAR HORIZONTAL AND BELOW THE GROUND SURFACE. THIS IS INDICATED BY THE LACK OF STAIN BELOW AND ABOVE IN THE NORMAL SAND-COLORED DUNE SANDSTONE. LATER THE DOME MOVED UPWARDLY (OR EROSION UNCOVERED IT) AND THE IRON SS. WAS SHOVED UPWARDLY TO THE WEST. SIMULTANEOUSLY, PORTIONS WERE SEGMENTED AND ROTATED IN SMALLER "CHUNKS":
TOQUERVILLE MOUND ABOVE HAS SEVERAL ARCUATE FEATURES WITHIN IT. IT HAS A CENTER-LINE VERTICAL FAULT (EXACTLY N-S), AND ARCUATE LATERAL FAULTING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER-LINE. THERE ARE 2 SMALLER DOMES ON THE NE AND SE SIDES, BUT NO OTHERS OF SIGNIFICANCE. IT IS MORE COMPLICATED THAN THE SMALLER DOMES FOUND NEAR THE AZ BORDER (ALSO HIGHER, WIDER, AND LARGER OVERALL).
The principle of this finding is due to the WOBBLE of the POLES- which create MILANKOVITCH CYCLES- that rotate in 25.6 (PRECESSIONAL) and 40.96 (AXIAL) k.y. time intervals. The above Google photos show clearly that convex arcs facing east have half of the tidal movement of those facing west. This is due to the influence of solar tides whenever MILANKOVITCH rotations face eastward, and are superseded by lunar tides, for the convex features facing west. That this is exactly a 2:1 presentation is shown by the BINARY THEOREM, where the harmonics have a series shown in rock shear: 100 years, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600 years. A smaller series has the numbers 10, 30, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280, 2560, 5120, 10240, 20480, 40960 years. The TIDAL MOVEMENT NUMBERS derive from a fourth and a half of the 4.096 root number: 10.24 and 20.48 mm/year (km/m.y.).
THIS HAS INTRODUCED a new facet- that there must be a series with multiples of 1000: 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000, 64000, 128000, 256000, 512000 yr, 1.024 million years. I had noticed that there were these multiples, but had ignored them (waiting for the TIME when I had FIELD EVIDENCE, with digital photos. Now it is necessary to determine whether there is a million year cycle of the earth, or whether the feature is more likely 1.024m.years in development. My intuition is that the slightly larger number is appropriate, and that Milankovitch could not calculate this small difference (2.4%).
BELOW IS A VIEW OF MOUNDS- COURTESY OF WIKIPEDIA- USED BY THE MOUND-DWELLER CULTURES OF THE EASTERN USA FOR RESPITE FROM FLOODS. THIS SHOWS THAT THE MOUNDS WERE FORMED BY ROTARY SHEAR WITH MALINKOVITCH-TYPE CYCLES. THE LOCATIONS CAN BE RELIED UPON TO DEFINE EARTH CRUST'S REGIONS OF FOLDING, THRUSTING, AND QUAKE-PRONE ZONES:
Another set of MOUNDS, which has a basin surrounding its IGNEOUS QUARTZ MONZONITE INTRUSION formation outcrop is that at the TOQUERVILLE FEEDER FROM hiway 17, near I-15 Anderson junction (NORTH SIDE). Above photo is taken of blocks of quartz monzonite- an intrusive rock found in the Pine Valley Mountains. Geologists continually argue as to the origin of these detached blocks. Are they fallen from an intrusive overhang, do they derive from gravity sliding, or do they indicate separate intrusions? This photo shows that they simply have sheared and rotated away from the parent mass, with the rotation of the 1 m.y. ellipse. Now, the question is: will they go into DENIAL, or will they continue to ARGUE?
The main question for me is: Will the million year rotation express itself as a 200 year major EARTHQUAKE? This is the anniversary of the largest main 48 states quake of all time- December 1811, the New Madrid super quake, that the geologists don’t understand. I have a significant shake predicted for the USA, and Laverkin, UT is the “USUAL SUSPECT”. It has already sunken in my 7 years of observation, and one house has been condemned near the Laverkin Creek bluff.
Now we have to concern ourselves with the divergence of the original BINARY THEOREM, where the sequence is: 2, 4, 8, 16 (Columbia basalt flood), 32, 64 (KT), 128, and 256m.y. (PTr). It now seems apparent that there is another HARMONIC series: 1K YEARS, 2K, 4K, 8K, 16K, 32K, 64K, 128K, 256K, 512K, 1.024 MILLION, 2.048, 4.096, 8.192, 16.384, 32.768, 65.536 million years (NEW KT, agreeing more with the radioactivity dating), and so on. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE MANY HARMONICS, AND WE HAVE TO DETERMINE WHICH IS MOST APPROPRIATE FROM FIELD DATA AND ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL PHOTOS.
FINDINGS SHOWN ABOVE ALLOW SOLUTION TO A MYSTERY I NOTICED AT THE EDGE OF THE PINE VALLEY MONZONITE BLOCKS (WHICH HAVE BEEN ROTATED AWAY FROM THE PARENT LACCOLITH). I HAD NOTICED THAT THERE WAS A CURVILINEAR TREND TO THE "ETCHINGS" into the QUARTZ-LIKE ROCK; THIS NOW IS APPARENTLY RELATED TO THE REGULAR "JERKS" OF THE MILLION YEAR SHEAR CIRCLE. THIS HAS VALUABLE INFORMATION, IN THAT THE CYCLICAL NATURE OF THE JERK TIMING MAY NOW BE SEEN. WE WILL MEASURE THE SEPARATION OF THE INDENTATIONS, TO DETERMINE THE REGULARITY AND SPACING (IN TERMS OF TIMING AND RELATION TO MAJOR QUAKES). THE LATERAL SEPARATION OF THE CURVILINEARS CAN BE USED TO OBTAIN THE DIAMETER OF THE SHEAR CIRCLE; POSSIBLY IT IS NOT 1 M.Y. SEPARATION APPEARS FROM THE PHOTO TO BE 10 CM OR MORE, AND 10 CM YIELDS 10 YEAR SEPARATIONS. THIS WOULD MAKE THE LARGER SHEAR CIRCLE A MILANKOVITCH 100 K.Y. FEATURE, AND THE RESULTANT "JERK" A FASTER FEATURE:
SOLVING THE TIME SPACING FROM THE INDENTATIONS REQUIRES THAT I MEASURE THE SEPARATION IN DISTANCE AND THE CIRCLE OF SHEAR TO WHICH THEY PERTAIN. SHOULD THEY BE PART OF A MILLION YEAR FEATURE (1 KM DIAMETER, PI CIRCUMFERENCE, OR 3140 M, 314,000 CM), THEN THE SPACING WILL BE A PART OF A 10.24 X DIAMETER, IN METERS ARC. IF THE CIRCUMFERENCE IS PI KILOMETERS, THE TIME WOULD BE 3.1416 X 1000 METERS, 314,000 CM, OR 31,400 YEARS PER JERK (I HAVE USED 10, RATHER THAN THE MORE CORRECT 10.24 MM/YEAR AVERAGE TIDAL WESTWARD MOVEMENT). I WILL HAVE TO RETURN TO THE FIRST MONZONITE OUTCROP NW OF I-15, TO SEARCH FOR THIS SET OF CURVILINEARS. YOU CAN SEE THAT THE LATERAL SEPARATION IS NOT CONSTANT BUT SOMEWHAT STATISTICAL. WE WILL USE THESE MEASUREMENTS TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE TIME OF ROTATION, AND TO GET THE REGULARITY OF THE EXPANSION OF THE SHEAR CIRCLE WITH TIME. THIS IS VALUABLE, SINCE THE CIRCULAR EXPANSION ALSO JERKS WITH TIME, AND IS NOT CONTINUOUS. I SUSPECT THAT THE FEATURE PERTAINS TO THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE EARTH'S CRUST TO THE ELLIPTICAL CYCLE OF THE EARTH IN THE EARTH-MOON-PLANETS-SUN GRAVITATIONAL CYCLES.
THERE ARE VARIOUS SIZES OF THE MONZONITE MOUNDS, AND I MUST HIKE INTO THE FIELD TO DISCERN THE RIGHT ONE. THE AGES VARY, AND I HOPE THAT I CAN FIND THE ONE WHICH HAS THE TIC MARKS IMPRINTED
FROM MY MEMORY OF 3 YEARS PRIOR, THE CORRECT OUTCROP APPEARS TO BE THE ONE ABOVE, AND THE AGE OF THE ELLIPSE WOULD BE DETERMINED BY A 25.6 K.Y. PRECESSIONAL CYCLE (HAVING A CIRCUMFERENCE OF 25K YR. X 1 CM/YR= 250 METERS). USING 10 CM AS A GUESS FOR THE SPACING OF THE TICS, YIELDS A YEARLY "TIC MARK"! THIS SEEMS UNREASONABLE, AND I MUST MEASURE IN THE FIELD.
No comments:
Post a Comment