data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e69f4/e69f45c1f58012056b49ebdabea96abb3ebf6445" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b53d9/b53d9626830c6c1d55a577cc72f7a5548b221831" alt=""
Below is a Google close-up photo of the isolated block of monzonite from the Pine Valley intrusion:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85042/85042775cb93bd3ddac7364e5f16b40ab3410599" alt=""
And below is a photo of another separate block, some 5 meters to the east, to show that this is not a artificial "fluke":
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698a/2698ae4a9ef781d282840730d26fffdb2e707378" alt=""
NOTE: 1. There is almost a regularity of the separation of the individual chisel marks;
2. All trends are parallel, for both separate monzonite blocks; and,
3. The whole sequence occurs between two saddles, which are aligned SE-NW (perpendicular to the trend of the main fractures). A new rule I follow, after "for every valley there's a stream" is a corallary "for every SADDLE there's a fault"
No comments:
Post a Comment