GOOGLE EARTH has revealed that there are periodic drastic changes in the orthogonal arrangement of breaks in the history of the EARTH: 256, 64, 16, 4 m.y. and there is now a hint that there was another at 1 m.y. This is also predicted in the BINARY THEOREM, where there are regularities in the fossil extinctions (2, 4, 8, 16 flood basalts, 32 Oregon plant changes, 64 KT dinosaur die-off, 128, and 256 m.y. PTr Permian-Triassic extinctions).
There seems to be another gravitational regularity of breaks in the positioning of objects about the SUN. P is planet, B is a break:
OBJECT DISTANCE, km, DISTANCE AU, RATIO to Mercury
Mercury 1 unit, .58 x 10exp.6 .387, to earth 1.0 P
ASTEROIDS 414.6 x 10exp.6 2.764 B 7.142, basic ratio
PLUTOIDS 5.9 x 10 exp.6 B 39.3AU 101.7, 14.24 (2 x asteroids)
KUIPER BELT 39 to1000AU, 102 to 2584 x Mercury (14.2to 935)
This is a multiple of 65.8, about the same as the KT multiple (64).
OORT CLOUD: up to 10 exp.5 AU, or 150 x 10exp.11 km (258,400 ratio to Mercury). This is near 1000 x 256- the PTr extinction in m.y. Again, we are equating time and distance, which Milankovitch has found correlates with the wobble and elliptical anomalies of the Pole positions.
The regularity is shown by the RATIOS: 2 (asteroid belt), 4 (Plutoids), 16 (inner Kuiper?), 64 (Kuiper), 256 (Oort cloud x 1000).
All this reveals that there are “forbidden zones” in the arrangement by GRAVITY of mass locations. Extrapolating, this would explain the zones between Lunar and Solar tides, where there is unusual error in using either 10.24 solar, or 20.48 mm lunar TIDAL MOVEMENTS. I measured 1 mm/year, for the Whidbey Island Penn Cove, where there was an inexplicable westward turn in the movement of the last glaciations (from southward to 256 degrees from north). This was accompanied by a reduction of tidal movement to 1 mm/year, and occurred with the last surge of ICE at approximately 14,000 years prior to now. I explained this anomaly as due to the transfer of mass (ice) to the seawater, causing the pole to develop a wobble with the weight of the ice moving away from the mountains to the sea.
IT APPEARS THAT GOOGLE EARTH IS TELLING US THAT GRAVITATIONAL ANOMALIES OCCUR ON THE 2-DIMENSIONAL MAP AS WELL AS IN 3-DIMENSIONAL SPACE. THE SUN ARRANGES MASS ACCCORDING TO THE BINARY THEOREM!
PROMOTION OF JUPITER:
The requirements for classification of a STAR are as follows:
1. The mass should be sufficient to promote FUSION, requiring Hydrogen and Helium be the main components. A BROWN DWARF is a star not meeting the mass necessary for heat generation by fusion, and this could be the case for Jupiter;
2. The size of the star determines the compression of the mass for fusion and this can be smaller than our SUN, with its 1.5 million km diameter (1 % of the distance from the EARTH);
3. Jupiter has more heat generated than is transmitted from the sun(a NET OUTFLOW), and this is thought to be due to compression, but could easily be due to nuclear processes. Due to the density being larger than that of the sun, this indicates that the core is not HYDROGEN and Helium but metallic. This may be an error, in which case Jupiter could be generating heat by processes unknown. This allows the planet to be a dwarf star, and this could be the case for re-consideration; and,
4. I have found that there is an instability at the ASTEROID BELT (between Mars and Jupiter), and this indicates that Jupiter is in the initiation of a new category of GRAVITATIONAL WAVES.
Altogether, Jupiter may be a CANDIDATE for DWARF STAR category- one which generates insufficient heat (FISSION OR RADIOACTIVE DECAY- PARTICULARLY K40?) for the case of FUSION, but sufficient for it to become a TRANSITORY STAR. THIS would be that of a BINARY twin to the SUN.
Although the mass of Jupiter is only 1/10 % of the parent SUN, this does not eliminate it from consideration as a dwarf star. It has some 60+ moons, is composed mostly of hydrogen and helium, and is generally considered as a mini-solar system. Let’s promote it to a BINARY DWARF STAR, SINCE THE BINARY THEOREM WORKS EXCELLENTLY (WITHIN 96% OR 4 PERCENT ERROR)!
GRAVITATIONAL INFLUENCE appears dominant in the creation of displacements, shear, rotation, and CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES on earth. Possibly a tabulation of the measurements of planets’ mass, distance from the sun, and RATIOS of these magnitudes will yield insight about the relative importance of the planets. Further, there is the finding that the asteroids represent discontinuities in gravitational waves- such that planets in the asteroid, Kuiper, and Oort belts cannot survive (and only fragments, such as comets and asteroids- remain). We will look for hints that the RATIOS of distances of the planets will denote the importance of categories of planets:
ORDER of PLANET DISTANCE from SUN and RELATIVE RATIOS
Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune, M km
57.9= 1: 108.2 150 227.9 778.4 1,426.7 2,871 4,498.3 M km
1.0 ref. 1.86Hg 2.59 3.936 13.44 24.641 49.59 77.69 to Mercury
.386earth .721 Earth=1 1.52 5.19e. 9.51e. 19.14e. 29.99 disc.@Jup.
.254Mars .475M .658 1.0 ref. 3.42 6.26 12.60M 19.74 Mars 3.94
.074Jup. .139 J .193J. .2937 Jup.=1 1.833 3.688 5.779
INVERSE 7.19 5.18 3.405 1.0 .546 .271J (preces?) .173 (5.78)
Sat. INV: 24.6 13.2 9.5 6.26 1.833 1.0ref. .4969 (2) .317 (3.15)
Ur.INV: 49.59 19.14 12.6 3.688 2.012,binary1.0 .6382 (1.59,anal.)Nept.INV: 77.7 41.57 19.74 5.7789 3.153 1.567 1.0 ref.
RATIOS most prevalent in CRUSTAL ROCK SHEAR occur more often with Mercury and Uranus. There is a hint that Jupiter represents a discontinuity, but this is not confirmed by Uranus- which has more familiar RATIOS than other planets in the ROCKY category. Earth/Mars ratio of 2.59 is the closest to the 2.5=100/40k.y. of Milankovitch cycles, whereas Venus/EARTH RATIO of 1/.721= 1.387 is closest to the expected ratio of earth radius/barycenter (center of mass from earth center, of EARTH-MOON COMBINATION) of 1.4. Although Jupiter has more mass than all the other planets combined, and is expected to represent the initiation of a 2nd gravitational wave from the sun, it does not divulge any RATIO which makes it pertinent to shear or rotation in crustal rocks. CONCLUSIONS:
1. MERCURY is of greater influence than others, as shown in the above table. I had expected that its influence is minimum, since it is the smallest, has little wobble, and represents the beginning of the first gravitational wave from the sun. It even displays the ratio Uranus/Mercury= 50- which is the EARTH CIRCUMFERENCE/distance between major TRANSFORMS in the Pacific (7.2 degrees of longitude, or 800 km- 1/50th of 360 degrees or 40K km for the entire earth);
2. URANUS is at the termination of a GRAVITATIONAL WAVE (beginning of the PLUTOIDS, or Kuiper belt planetoids; NEPTUNE?), whereas Mercury is at the start of the 1st wave. Middle ground exists at Jupiter, but the LARGEST PLANET represents more of a disruption than anything else. I expect that Jupiter occurs at the opposite portion of a gravitational wave- at an inflection (a downturn, if Mercury and Uranus represent initiation of waves); and,
3. Mars exhibits the ratio of 3.94- the ratio of Milankovitch’s ELLIPTICAL/PRECESSIONAL cycles= 100/25= 4.0. It is an intermediate, and the last of the rocky planets. It should have maximum wobble of the poles, and influence earth considerably, since it is closest. Although it is smaller than earth, it is almost as bright as Venus- the one influencing our weather the most.
ASTEROID CERES is likely at a LIGHT WAVE INFLECTION Although Jupiter is the beginning of an anomalous location of a GRAVITATIONAL CHANGE, the most likely inflection would occur within the ASTEROID BELT. CERES is the largest of the candidates, and it exists 2.767 AU, or 500 seconds/AU, at 1385.5 seconds from the sun. This is equivalent to 1385/60 minutes/1440 minutes/day= .01604 days (1/60th day). Pluto at 5906.38 million km, or 19,688 sec. (.2279 days), may be a candidate for the inflection occurring at the Kuiper Belt. The ratio of these 2 inflection distances is 14.23. This calculates 6.24x10exp-4 years for the Kuiper belt, and 4.392x 10exp-5 years, for the asteroids.
The anomalous 41 m.y. feature occurring many places on EARTH is equivalent to 1293.83x10exp+6 seconds, which is 3.88x10exp+9 km. The circumference of EARTH is 4x10exp+4 km. or approximately 1/100,000th (10exp-5) of the distance LIGHT TRAVELS in 41 m.y. (3% error). This is a resonance, and further related to the inflections at .107 for Ceres (415.05 million km/3880), and 1.52 for Kuiper (Pluto at 5906 million km). The expected error of 4% or less applies to Kuiper (1.5), with an error of 7% for Ceres (1/10th HARMONIC). The 41 m.y. anomaly can be related to the resonance of gravitational waves at the asteroid and Kuiper inflections or “FORBIDDEN ZONES”.
LET'S ANALYZE AVAILABLE MEASUREMENTS for the VARIOUS AGE EVENTS
EVENT AGE POSITION LOCATION ARC-ENCLOSED FULCRUM, BEYOND EVENT:
PTr 256 m.y. SW coast, Australia Spratly I. 5000km/N (2x KT)
KT 64 M.Y. Yucatan Mexico Cayman SE900km, Curacao 2600km
Flood basalt 16 OR WA USA Olympic R.-Siskiyou 590km/60 (1/4)
Hudson Byam 4 Canada NW passage 1856km/347, NNW (1/1.4)
Chesapeake 8 USA Cape Hatteras 362 km/N (1/8th)
Puget Sound 15,625 USA Olympic Mt. 98km/E E. side of SOUND
RATIOS of FRAGMENTATION separation are in the 2x ORDER, except for NW passage, and 1/26.5 (near 1/24th) for Puget sound, or the ELLIPSE formed at Byam Martin Island. This requires an investigation into the excessive elliptical extension to the north. This is the method used with gravitation, to form the ELLIPSE ENCLOSING an ANALEMMA. THIS EXPLAINS THE SHAPE, but NOT the FRAGMENTATION! It appears that WAVES have destructive power, in both SPACE and at ORTHOGONAL (CARDINAL POINTS of the COMPASS) extremities on continents. Notice that the FRAGMENTATION OCCURS at borders of land mass (coastlines), and that the SEPARATION DECREASES with time- since the AGE of the EVENTS. The important question to ask: “1. Why does the severity decrease with time, and 2. why does it occur at extremities?”
The answer to 1. the edge-of-continent query, should be: GRAVITY WAVES fashion most obviously at the contrast of LOW DENSITY SEAWATER and HIGH DENSITY ROCK (note that basalt contrasts more than continental crust, with water, and that OCEANIC VOLCANOES fragment more rapidly than coasts: witness MAUI, of 2 m.y- compared to SAN FRANCISCO PEAKS, AZ, which are just beginning to fragment.
2. The distance of EARTH from SUN increases with TIME (EARTH ORBIT SLOWS, and the ellipse ELONGATES). It has been reported that the 100 k.y. MILANKOVITCH CYCLE has become noticeable in ICE AGE CORING, (NOT BEFORE, with 40k.y. cycles dominating in older samples, less for those occurring after 2 m.y.) and there occur million year and 2 m.y. ellipses in rock outcrops. There may be Critical DISTANCES, above which gravitational destruction becomes of lesser importance!
CARDINAL POINTS SEPARATION from CENTER of FRAGMENTATION: The progression of GRAVITATIONAL DISTURBANCES, or EXTINCTIONS, according to the BINARY THEOREM: EVENT AGE POSITION LOCATION FULCRUM BEYOND PTr 256 m.y. SW coast, Australia Spratly I. 5000km/N (2x KT) KT 64 M.Y. Yucatan Mexico Cayman SE900km, Curacao 2600km Flood basalt 16 OR WA USA Olympic R.-Siskiyou 590km/60 (1/4) Hudson Byam 4 Canada NW passage 1856km/347, NNW (1/1.4) Chesapeake 8 USA Cape Hatteras 362 km/N (1/8th) Puget Sound 15,625 USA Olympic Mt. 98km/E E. side of SOUND RATIOS of FRAGMENTATION separation are in the 2x ORDER, except for NW passage, and 1/26.5 (near 1/24th) for Puget sound, or the ELLIPSE formed at Byam Martin Island. This requires an investigation into the excessive elliptical extension to the north. This is the method used with gravitation, to form the ELLIPSE ENCLOSING an ANALEMMA. THIS EXPLAINS THE SHAPE, but NOT the FRAGMENTATION! It appears that WAVES have destructive power, in both SPACE and at ORTHOGONAL (CARDINAL POINTS of the COMPASS) extremities on continents. Notice that the FRAGMENTATION OCCURS at borders of land mass (coastlines), and that the SEPARATION DECREASES with time- since the AGE of the EVENTS. The important question to ask: “1. Why does the severity decrease with time, and 2. why does it occur at extremities?” The answer to 1. the edge-of-continent query, should be: GRAVITY WAVES fashion most obviously at the contrast of LOW DENSITY SEAWATER and HIGH DENSITY ROCK (note that basalt contrasts more than continental crust, with water, and that OCEANIC VOLCANOES fragment more rapidly than coasts: witness MAUI, of 2 m.y- compared to SAN FRANCISCO PEAKS, AZ, which are just beginning to fragment. 2. The distance of EARTH from SUN increases with TIME (EARTH ORBIT SLOWS, and the ellipse ELONGATES). It has been reported that the 100 k.y. MILANKOVITCH CYCLE has become noticeable in ICE AGE CORING, (less than 2 m.y.) and there occur million year and 2 m.y. ellipses in rock outcrops. There may be Critical DISTANCES, above which gravitational destruction becomes of lesser importance! FRAGMENTATION due to GRAVITATIONAL FORBIDDEN ZONES not only occurs in the ASTEROID BELT, but in EARTH’S CRUST ARCHIPELAGOS such as E. and WEST INDIES: The BINARY THEOREM finds that extinctions (and distinctions) occur in a pattern, due to occurrences of DISRUPTIONS caused by regular anomalies at the CARDINAL POINTS in Qsna- the North American QUADRANSPHERE, an ELLIPSE where fragmentations occurred at the east, south, west, and an extended north extremity. This includes the antipode to the PTr EVENT, the KT at Yucatan, the FLOOD BASALT near the Columbia River, and the NW passage at Byam Martin island. The CW rotation of events has continued, to embrace the fragmented Puget Sound, and the Cape Hatteras-Chesapeake bay area. These fit in TIME, with the series 256, 64, 16, 4, 1 m.y., continuing to the ICE AGE at its15,625 year termination (Penn Cove, Whidbey Island). This is a subset of the Binary Progression of: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, on to 4096 m.y. or 4.096 billion years- the AGE of the MOON. Continuing, we know that the earth orbited faster before the CAPTURE of the Moon, and that Lunar Friction slowed the earth and caused it to move farther from the sun later. The known change in LOD (length of day) and movement outward from its previous orbital position is: 1.8 milliseconds/century, or 18 seconds/m.y. The increase of separation is accompanied by increase of distance of the EARTH to the SUN, at a rate of: 3.26 x 10exp-10 m/second, or 60 x 1440 min/day x 365.24 days/year= 31,556,736 multiplier x rate= .10287 m/yr= 102,870 m/m.y. or 102.87 km/m.y. increase of radius from Earth to Sun. The period from 256-64 m.y. (PTr to KT)= 192 m.y. yields 19,752 km increase- or half of the circumference of the earth. Compare this magnitude to the change with ELLIPTICITY of 1.0%= 1.5 million km- a large change from a circular ORBIT about the sun; the expected elliptical shift outwardly during 192 m.y. is 100 times as large as the shift during the most TUMULTUOUS period for LIFE (as observed in the FOSSIL RECORD). This calculation indicates that the slowing of the earth during the EXTINCTION interlude is insignificant, compared to a small elliptical shift during the MILANKOVITCH CYCLE of 1 m.y. (a cycle or ellipse noticed in outcrops). THE LITERATURE generally indicates that ellipticity in normal times is about 1/10th %, but an elongated orbit may be attained during conjunction of several planets (attracting the earth away from the sun). BINARY THEOREM STATES THAT the MOON is the ORIGINATOR of EXPANDING BULGES, CONTINENTS, and EARTH-MOON GRAVITATIONAL DISRUPTIONS: Since the moon expands Qsna by 4096 km over a period since its capture at 4,096million years, the expansion rate is 1 mm/year (1 km/m.y.). I thought that it should be 1.024mm/yr, but the physics determine the smaller magnitude. This distance is that from the Cape Hatteras extremity to the Mendocino, CA COAST, and there is an error due to the 41m.y. EVENT, which I will sort out later. The EARTH-MOON separation is increasing by .0382 m/year .0000382 km/yr), and this yields .382 km/yr, or 73.44km interval between the 256 PTr and 64 m.y. KT events. These are the 2 most destructive events shown to eliminate LIFE, and the most investigated, by geologists. This, again, is a small change, but relative to the EARTH-MOON SEPARATION of 384,400 km, it represents a RATIO of.019% (use 1/50th%). Is this sufficient to create the drastic changes noticed on earth? The fossil and stratigraphic record indicates that, over a several million year period, the bays and lakes desiccated- leaving voluminous salt beds- and that most LIFE was eliminated (especially in the MARINE ENVIRONMENT). This record lies all around the early Mesozoic era, near the Hurricane Fault, on the west side. The rock becomes red, compared to grey limestone in the interval preceding (Kaibab of Paleozoic era). There is a discontinuity of TIME and stratigraphic record. Can we “LAY THIS OFF” on GRAVITATIONAL FRAGMENTATION for this case and others, which represent a DISRUPTION of the record and LIFE? Others include those formed subsequent to KT- such as the archipelago of the FLORIDA KEYS, the Aleutian Spiral, the Central American curlicue, and the Japanese Islands. If so, there is a GRAVITATIONALLY-INSTIGATED “FORBIDDEN ZONE” for the earth-moon system, similar to that found in the ASTEROID, KUIPER, and OORT BELTS, for the solar system. This zone will have the effect of creating disruption to the 4 CARDINAL POINT continent of North America- E, S, W, and N, as TIMED-NOT TION of the continent continues CW (opposite to the CCW rotation of the Qsna ELLIPSE). WE WILL HAVE TO TEST THIS RELATION WITH ANOTHER CONTINENT- AUSTRALIA BEING the one most affected by the PTr EVENT!
